Cases 41 - 50 of 181
Buckley v. City of Westland et al
as 2:2020cv11315
Defendant:
James Starks, Jason Neville, Jason Blanchard and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald W Buckley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Raker v. Coleman et al
as 1:2020cv02231
Respondent:
Jackie Fulford, Timothy Carr, Georgia Dept of Corrections and others
Petitioner:
Dustin H. Raker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Raker v. Coleman et al
as 4:2020cv00114
Respondent:
Jackie Fulford, Timothy Carr, Georgia Dept of Corrections and others
Petitioner:
Dustin H. Raker
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv77692
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Miller et al
as 4:2020cv00098
Defendant:
Brian Miller, United States Postal Service and J Moody
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
as 2:2019cv00793
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, Life Insurance Company of North America and MRC Global (US) INC. Long-Term Disability Plan
Plaintiff:
Brian Miller
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Henderson v. Moody et al
as 4:2019cv00536
Defendant:
Grisham Phillips, Susan Carter, Kristine Gerard Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Contrell Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02224
Plaintiff:
Micky Brooks, Mark Gerasimas, Ranada Lowe and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
BAKER et al v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv03250
Plaintiff:
MICKY BROOKS, MARK GERASIMAS, RANADA LOWE and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv02114
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
