Cases 41 - 50 of 74
Anderson et al v. Chandler et al
as 2:2012cv00813
Plaintiff:
Anthony D Anderson and Gay-Dee Anderson
Defendant:
John D Chandler , Unknown Chandler , Jeffrey MacDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Chandler et al
as 3:2012cv00043
Plaintiff:
Jason Jerell Smith
Defendant:
Larry D. Chandler, Carolyn W. Mudd and Vernan Wilburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Chanlar et al
as 3:2011cv00055
Plaintiff:
Allen Jones
Defendant:
Larry D. Chandler, Air Mark, Page Magire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Veteran's Affairs for the United States of America
as 6:2011cv06019
Plaintiff:
James D. Chandler
Defendant:
Veteran's Affairs for the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Dennis Temple v. Willie Johnson
as 11-6042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS M. TEMPLE
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIE JOHNSON, Chief of the City of Geenville Department of Police, BRENDA S. BINNS, Judge, RALPH PUTNAM, Judge and others
Defendant:
GREENVILLE COUNTY and TANIESHA NICOLE WILLIAMS
Chandler v. Volunteers of America, North Alabama, Inc.
as 3:2010cv02961
Plaintiff:
April D. Chandler
Defendant:
Volunteers of America, North Alabama, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Benson v. Luttrell et al
as 2:2010cv02686
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
Mark Luttrell, Jr., James E. Coleman, Robert Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Jackson v. Larry Chandler
as 10-6060
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS NEAL JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
LARRY D. CHANDLER, Warden
Chandler v. American International South Insurance Co et al
as 1:2010cv01103
Defendant:
American International South Insurance Co and Paul Stevens
Plaintiff:
Rosemary D. Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas Jackson v. Larry Chandler
as 10-5512
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS NEAL JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
LARRY D CHANDLER, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
