Cases 41 - 50 of 347
Mathis et al v. Norman et al
as 1:2022cv01357
Plaintiff:
Diwann M. Mathis, Marketa I. Mathis, N.W. and others
Defendant:
Saralee Norman, Avi Norman, John Does 1-10 (fictitious names) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
William Dewey v. Noah Nagy
as 22-1898
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM D.M. DEWEY
Respondent / Appellee:
NOAH NAGY, Warden
Morales v. Cardenas
as 22-50836
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Fernando Morales, Individually and on behalf of his minor children, F.M. and D.M. and Zerenia Cardoza, in her Individual Capacity
Defendant / Appellant:
Ruben Cardenas
D.M. v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv05338
Plaintiff:
D.M.
Defendant:
The City of New York, Police Officer Matthew McCurry and Police Officer Joseph Vigiano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Johnson v. Rouse et al
as 3:2022cv00288
Plaintiff:
Kennedy Fitzgerald Johnson
Defendant:
Melissa Rouse, D.M. Bogar and J Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinsdale Bank and Trust Company, N.A. v. CryptoFi, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03667
Plaintiff:
Hinsdale Bank and Trust Company, N.A.
Defendant:
CryptoFi, Inc., D.M., M.M. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-939
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Knight v. City of Omaha
as 8:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
Phyllis M. Knight and Phyllis M. Knight Bey D.M.
Defendant:
City of Omaha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
