Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Eiland v. Russell County District Court et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2018cv00799
Defendant:
Dist. Court, Heath Taylor, The Russell Commission of Russell County Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Lee Eiland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Boateng v. Berlin et al
as 1:2017cv01358
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Kwame Boateng
Defendant:
B. S. Berlin, City of Alex Police Dept and City of Alex Gen Dist Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doremus v. Toledo Police Department et al
as 3:2017cv02061
Plaintiff:
Stanley B. Doremus
Defendant:
Toledo Police Department, Lucas County Sheriff, United States Marshal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Donelson v. US Dist. Court et al
as 1:2017cv06336
Petitioner:
Joseph Donelson
Respondent:
US Dist. Court , U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Eddie Boyd Connor v. U.S. Dist. Court
as 2:2017cv03054
Petitioner:
Eddie Boyd Connor
Respondent:
U.S. Dist. Court
Barber v. Chief Judge Special Court of Appeals et al
as 1:2017cv00554
Plaintiff:
Ellis Barber
Defendant:
Chief Judge Special Court of Appeals, Howard County Circuit Court, Howard County Dist Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robinson v. Stephens, Director, TDCJ-ID et al
as 3:2016cv00341
Petitioner:
Larry Lynn Robinson
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director, TDCJ-ID, Dallas County Sheriff's Dept, DPS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BANKS v. CONTI et al
as 2:2015cv01341
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
JOY FLOWERS CONTI, US DIST COURT FOR THE WEST DIST OF PA, TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roundtree v. NYC et al
as 1:2015cv07253
Plaintiff:
Juel Roundtree
Defendant:
NYC, NY health and Hospital Police Dept., D.H.S. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. DENVER GEN DIST COURT
as 1:2013cv01475
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE D. JOHNSON
Defendant:
DENVER GEN DIST COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
