Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Ray v. Diaz
as 5:2013cv00503
Petitioner:
James Patrick Ray
Respondent:
Ralph Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ray et al v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 4:2012cv00747
Plaintiff:
James R. Ray and Shannon M. Ray
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
USA v. James Ray
as 12-3319
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES K. RAY
RAY et al v. GASANOV et al
as 2:2012cv00397
Plaintiff:
SANDRA RAY and JAMES E. RAY, SR.
Defendant:
ARTUR GASANOV , SHAMIL KUBANOV , KOBAN LOGISTICS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1332
Ray v. Triad Group, Inc. et al
as 8:2011cv01561
Plaintiff:
James David Ray, Jr.
Defendant:
Triad Group, Inc. , H&P Industries, Inc. and CVS Caremark Corporation
Counter_claimant:
CVS Caremark Corporation
Counter_defendant:
H&P Industries, Inc. and Triad Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ray v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2011cv01178
Plaintiff:
James M Ray
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Angel Valley Ministries et al v. Ray et al
as 3:2010cv08204
Plaintiff:
Angel Valley Ministries and Angel Valley Spiritual Retreat Center LLC
Defendant:
James Arthur Ray , Unknown Ray, James Ray International Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ray v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2010cv00222
Plaintiff:
James R Ray, Jr
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Ray v. Jefferson County Jail
as 4:2010cv01194
Plaintiff:
James L. Ray, III
Defendant:
Jefferson County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bricker Companies, Inc. et al v. RayTrans Trucking, LLC et al
as 5:2010cv00064
Plaintiff:
Bricker Companies, Inc. , Brick Jones and Gary Jones
Defendant:
RayTrans Trucking, LLC , James A Ray, Jr , James M Ray, Sr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
