Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Campbell v. Daniel et al
as 2:2013cv14395
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Campbell
Defendant:
John Michael Daniel , William Wilson , Christopher Dameron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Richard Gurule, et al v. Mike Root, et al
as 11-36042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD E. GURULE, ASHLEY T. MENG, BILLY D. DAVIS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE ROOT, Jail Commander, CONMED HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT INC., STEVEN BLUM and others
Campbell v. Organon USA, Inc et al
as 4:2011cv02091
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Campbell
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc , Organon International, Inc. , Merck & Co, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell v. Organon USA, Inc et al
as 0:2011cv03168
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Campbell
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc , Organon International, Inc. , Merck & Co, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gurule et al v. Hanlin et al
as 6:2011cv01274
Defendant:
Dr. Terry C. Bancroft, C.F.M. Kitchen Manager Gisel Bitterman, Dr. Steven Blum and others
Plaintiff:
Billy D. Davis, Dennis R. Fain, Richard E. Gurule and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Astrue
as 8:2011cv01790
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Campbell
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
