Cases 41 - 50 of 74,909
Reed-Jones v. O'Donnell
as 3:2024cv00874
Petitioner:
Aaron Reed-Jones
Respondent:
Nicole Morrisey O'Donnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
JONES v. THE CITY OF GREENSBORO et al
as 1:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN ROBERT JONES
Defendant:
THE CITY OF GREENSBORO and GREENSBORO FIRE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
(PC) McDonald v. Jones et al
as 2:2024cv01027
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D. McDonald
Defendant:
Gena Jones, B. Chaves, Berumen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. St Joseph County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Derek Lee Jones
Defendant:
St Joseph County Jail and Armark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. City of Madisonville
as 4:2024cv02048
Plaintiff:
Troy Dale Jones
Defendant:
City of Madisonville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Franks v. Jones
as 6:2024cv03232
Plaintiff:
Jason Ray Franks
Defendant:
Mark A Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jones v. Charleston County et al
as 6:2024cv03237
Plaintiff:
Nekeya Jones
Defendant:
Charleston County, Charleston County Sheriff's Office, Wellpath LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Sylvester, et al. v. Sacramento County Sheriff, et al.
as 24-3390
Plaintiff:
RYAN SYLVESTER and ANGELA ELLIS
Defendant:
SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SCOTT R. JONES and others
JONES v. SYMONETTE et al
as 2:2024cv02249
Plaintiff:
ELAINE JONES
Defendant:
ALLAN A. SYMONETTE, BOISE BUTLER, JAMILLA HASBEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STEWART v. BLAKNEY et al
as 2:2024cv02211
Plaintiff:
BEN ROBERT STEWART
Defendant:
JAMES BLAKNEY, DORTHEA BARNS, IEASHA EDWARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
