Cases 41 - 50 of 269
Clarke v. Roberts et al
as 1:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Julia Roberts, Jake Tapper, Steven Bo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnson v. Hall et al
as 7:2022cv00873
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lynn Johnson
Defendant:
Todd Hall, Justin White and Hasty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
State of Texas vs Johnson Jr.
as 6:2022cv00633
Plaintiff:
STATE OF TEXAS
Defendant:
Arthur Lynn Johnson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
City of Taylor, TN, et al v. Astec Industries, Inc., et al
as 21-5602
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID C. SILVIOUS, ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC., BENJAMIN G. BROCK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LYNN JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
CITY OF TAYLOR, TN, GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Johnson v. Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
as 3:2022cv00430
Defendant:
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc., Hampton by Hilton and Hampton Inn & Suites
Plaintiff:
Lynn Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
C.S. et al v. Long County School District et al
as 2:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
C.S., Neil Sinclair and Sara Sinclair
Defendant:
Long County School District, Marnita Lynn Johnson, Beverly Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2009mc00077
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
DAWN DESIREE CUMMINGS, FAZIA DEEN-BACCHUS, LISA MARIE DIRIG and others
Johnson v. Goodwin
as 21-30592
Petitioner / Appellant:
Melvin Lynn Johnson, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Jerry Goodwin, Warden, David Wade Correctional Center
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv01073
Plaintiff:
Jody Lynn Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
