Cases 41 - 50 of 284
Kennedy v. Lumpkin
as 22-50682
Petitioner / Appellant:
Michael Patrick Kennedy
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
USA v. Michael Hernandez
as 22-50167
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL PATRICK HERNANDEZ
Patrick v. Kingston Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv01167
Plaintiff:
Quincy Michael Patrick
Defendant:
Kingston Police Department, State Parole Scranton, Det. Richard Kotchin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
BURNETT v. OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF/ D.O.N et al
as 1:2022cv00479
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PATRICK BURNETT
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF/ D.O.N, OFFICER/CO HOOD, L.T. RICHARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prince Jr. v. SMC Acquisition Corp.
as 3:2022cv00458
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Prince Jr. and Michael Patrick Prince Jr.
Defendant:
SMS Acquisition Corp. and SMC Acquisition Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Perkins v. Patrick et al
as 1:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
Dorsey Perkins
Defendant:
Michael Patrick and Spruill Property Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Grant II v. Carns
as 5:2022cv02932
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant II
Defendant:
Michael Patrick Chamberlain Carns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
BURNETT v. OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF et al
as 1:2022cv00326
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PATRICK BURNETT
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF, SGT. CLARKE, OFFICER BOGNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
