Cases 41 - 50 of 458
Michael Green v. USDC-CASF
as 22-70242
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MICHAEL GREEN and RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden
Petitioner:
MICHAEL GREEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Dudenhefer et al v. Encompass Insurance Company of America
as 2:2022cv03549
Plaintiff:
Nicole Dudenheifer, Michael Green, Michael S. Green and others
Defendant:
Encompass Insurance Company of America
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
KORNAFEL v. PENNSYLVANIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 2:2022cv03684
Plaintiff:
STANLEY E. KORNAFEL
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, DELAWARE COUNTY, SPIROS ANGELOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Victor Walthour v. John Herron, et al
as 22-2514
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VICTOR WALTHOUR
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN W. HERRON, PAUL FELDMAN, DEAN E. WEISGOLD and others
USA v. Kevin Green
as 22-5850
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KEVIN MICHAEL GREEN
(HC) Green v. Allison
as 2:2022cv01423
Petitioner:
Michael Green
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LASTER v. CITY OF AMERICUS et al
as 1:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN LASTER
Defendant:
CITY OF AMERICUS, ALFONSON ROSS, J MICHAEL GREENE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GREEN v. BLAND et al
as 1:2022cv01491
Plaintiff:
SHANE MICHAEL GREEN
Defendant:
RYAN BLAND, LANCE D. HAMNER and MICHAEL AVGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v. Andris
as 3:2022cv01444
Plaintiff:
Michael Green
Defendant:
Simeon Andris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Greene v. USA
as 6:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
Michael Greene
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
