Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Mitchell v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2015cv02229
Petitioner:
Phillip Mitchell
Respondent:
Arizona, State of and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Matthew Hamby, et al v. Sean Parnell, et al
as 14-35856
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MATTHEW HAMBY, CHRISTOPHER SHELDEN, a married couple, CHRISTINA LABORDE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SEAN C. PARNELL, in his official capacity as Governor of Alaska, MICHAEL GERAGHTY, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Alaska, WILLIAM J. STREUR, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the State of Alaska, Department of Health and Social Services and others
Hamby et al v. Parnell et al
as 3:2014cv00089
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hamby , Christopher Shelden , Christina Laborde and others
Defendant:
Sean C. Parnell, Michael Geraghty, William J. Streur and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ConforMIS, Inc. v. Acacia Research Group LLC et al
as 1:2013cv10377
Plaintiff:
ConforMIS, Inc.
Defendant:
Acacia Research Group LLC, Advanced Skeletal Innovations LLC , Bonutti Skeletal Innovations, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Inge v. Echols et al
as 7:2012cv02495
Plaintiff:
Derrick Inge
Defendant:
Andrew Echols, Fred Rice, Tyree Murphy and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. Mitchell
as 1:2012cv00213
Plaintiff:
Jed Nagel
Defendant:
William Phillip Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell, et al v. Wilkerson, et al.
as 2:2012cv01336
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois and Margot Wilkerson
Plaintiff:
Shawna Mitchell and Phillip Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillip Mitchell v. Douglas Vasbinder
as 09-1894
Petitioner - Appellant:
PHILLIP MITCHELL
Respondent - Appellee:
DOUGLAS C. VASBINDER
Seale v. Mitchell
as 3:2008cv00105
Plaintiff:
Charles Derrell Seale
Defendant:
Phillip Mitchell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
