Cases 41 - 50 of 90
Scalf v. North American Crane & Rigging, LLC
as 8:2017cv03124
Plaintiff:
Stephen Scalf
Defendant:
North American Crane & Rigging, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Williams v. Unicoi County Jail et al
as 2:2017cv00139
Defendant:
Barbra Scalf, Kenny Jones, Darrel Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Williams, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scalf v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv03552
Plaintiff:
Amy Scalf
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCALF v. LOOP et al
as 4:2017cv00120
Defendant:
FRANK LOOP, MELANIE and J. WARD
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KEITH SCALF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv07954
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Scalf v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv05774
Plaintiff:
Phoebe J Scalf
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
APONTE et al v. BAYER CORP., et al
as PAE/2:16-cv-03769
Plaintiff:
JAMMIE APONTE , APRIL ARLOTTA , ELLEN BENNETT and others
Defendant:
BAYER CORP. , BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC , BAYER ESSURE, INC. and others
APONTE et al v. BAYER CORP., et al
as 2:2016cv03769
Plaintiff:
JAMMIE APONTE , APRIL ARLOTTA , ELLEN BENNETT and others
Defendant:
BAYER CORP. , BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC , BAYER ESSURE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Estate of Nonnie Kasben et al v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2016cv00805
Plaintiff:
Estate of Nonnie Kasben , Penny Abularach , Wanda Brown and others
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America and Metropolitan Government for Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scalf v. Classic Alaska Trading/Big Ray's Alaska, Inc.
as 4:2016cv00014
Plaintiff:
Catherine Scalf
Defendant:
Classic Alaska Trading/Big Ray's Alaska, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
