Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Evans v. Astrue
as 5:2011cv00049
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Thomas Owen Evans, IV
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Morgan et al v. Cohen et al
as 2:2011cv11780
Plaintiff:
Louis Morgan, Herbert Helton, Philip Berryman and others
Defendant:
Zivit Cohen, Prisoner Health Services, Jeffery Stevie and others
Childs v. Streicher et al
as 1:2010cv00789
Plaintiff:
Keenan Childs
Defendant:
Thomas Streicher, Thomas Owens, Cincinnati Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWEN v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2010cv00837
Plaintiff:
BARRY THOMAS OWEN, JR.
Defendant:
TERRY S JOHNSON , B. J. BARNES , JOHN DOE (1) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In re: Thomas Owen Mix, Jr.Esq.
as 10-80163
Respondent:
In re: THOMAS OWEN MIX, Jr., Esquire, Admitted to the bar of the Ninth Circuit: May 27, 1997,
ROZIER et al v. JOHNSTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2009cv00327
Plaintiff:
DONNIE PAUL ROZIER, JR. and ROZIER ASSOCIATES INC.
Defendant:
JOHNSTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT, CAPTIAN OF POLICE ANDREW FRAER, OFFICER CHAD MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas Owens v. A.r. Wilfley & Sons, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-76534
Defendant:
A.r. Wilfley & Sons
Plaintiff:
Thomas Owens
OWENS v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv76534
Plaintiff:
THOMAS OWENS
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Imbraguglio et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 2:2007cv08189
Plaintiff:
Angelina Imbraguglio, Angelina Imbraguglio, Angelina Imbraguglio and others
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
DeNardo v. Owens et al
as 3:2007cv00142
Plaintiff:
Daniel DeNardo
Defendant:
Thomas Owens, Tenys B. Owens, Mark Begich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
