Cases 41 - 50 of 78
Dodd v. Marshall et al
as 2:2012cv00522
Plaintiff:
David A Dodd
Defendant:
James W Marshall and East Wenatchee, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Holder
as 12-1892
Petitioner:
Garnet William Marshall, AKA Garnet Marshall, AKA Garnet W. Marshall, AKA Garnette Marshall
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Marshall et al
as 1:2011cv04439
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
Tiffany B. Marshall and Adam W. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Broadcast Music Inc et al v. Bravert Inc et al
as 8:2011cv01766
Plaintiff:
Arrested Development Music, Broadcast Music Inc, Cahron Childs and others
Defendant:
Bravert Inc, Bryan M Gonzales and Robert W Marshall
MARSHALL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv58412
Plaintiff:
BYRON W MARSHALL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Green v. North Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2011ct03175
Plaintiff:
Larry K. Green
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Corrections, Carlton B. Joyner, Tresa Brown Tomlinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HSM TIRE COMPANY LIMITED v. MCCarley et al
as 4:2011cv03351
Plaintiff:
HSM TIRE COMPANY LIMITED
Defendant:
Michael Donald MCCarley, OTR TIRE SUPPLY, LLC, Robert W Marshall, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Timmons v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2011cv02696
Plaintiff:
Michael Timmons
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Shelby County, City of Memphis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARSHALL v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES et al
as 2:2011cv63106
Plaintiff:
EUGENE W. MARSHALL
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, BENJAMIN FOSTER COMPANY, CAREY-CANADA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gerald Marshall v. Bruce Kirby
as 10-17923
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GERALD W. MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellant:
BRUCE KIRBY, Lieutenant, individually and in his official capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
