Cases 41 - 50 of 144
Woods v. Franklin Collection Service Inc
as 5:2017cv01177
Plaintiff:
William C Woods
Defendant:
Franklin Collection Service Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Wood v. PNC Financial Services Group Inc..
as 8:2017cv00897
Plaintiff:
William B. Wood
Defendant:
PNC Financial Services Group Inc..
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Blaisdell v. William E. Wood & Associates, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00032
Plaintiff:
James P. Blaisdell
Defendant:
William E. Wood & Associates, Inc., Howard Hanna Company and Howard Hanna Insurance Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States v. Wood
as 17-5025
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM DON WOODS
WILLIAMS v. WOODS et al
as 1:2016cv00387
Plaintiff:
BRUCE M WILLIAMS
Defendant:
KHRG EMPLOYER, LLC, WILLIAM O WOODS, LORRAINE D TUCCIO and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
WOOD v. MIDWEST WAFFLES, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv03217
Plaintiff:
WOOD and WILLIAM R WOOD
Defendant:
MIDWEST WAFFLES, INC, WAFFLE HOUSE, INC. and MIDWEST WAFFLES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOODS v. IMPD et al
as 1:2016cv01442
Defendant:
IMPD, MARION COUNTY COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS and MARION COUNTY PROSECUTER
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM P WOODS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv01342
Plaintiff:
William N. Woods
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Wood et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2015cv03311
Petitioner:
William G. Wood and Seaside Seafood, Inc.
Respondent:
United States of America, John Koskinen and Jalal M. Abul-Huda
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Wood v. Myers
as 4:2015cv00795
Plaintiff:
William W Wood
Defendant:
Jessica Leann Myers
Counter_claimant:
Jessica Leann Myers
Counter_defendant:
William W Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
