Cases 51 - 60 of 11,764
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Sparks (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv01373
Plaintiff:
Rustin Dean Sparks
Defendant:
Andre Stancil, Marshall Griffith, Ryan Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FAI rent-a-jet GmbH v. Covac Global Holdings, Inc. et al
as 9:2024cv80608
Plaintiff:
FAI rent-a-jet GmbH
Defendant:
Covac Global Holdings, Inc., Covac Global LLC, Ross Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Choate v. Kings County Superior Court et al
as 1:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
George Graham Choate
Defendant:
Kings County Superior Court and Fandy Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham Schiff v. Anthony Brown
as 24-1408
Plaintiff:
GRAHAM HARRY SCHIFF
Defendant:
ANTHONY G. BROWN, Maryland Attorney General, JOHN MCCARTHY, Montgomery County State's Attorney, NICHOLAS PICERNO, Captain for Montgomery County Police and others
Nelson v. Stanga et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
Howard J Nelson
Defendant:
Gary T Stanga, Kelsey Miller, William R Penton, III and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Graham v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Martha Graham
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC and Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Graham v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv01224
Petitioner:
William Charles Graham
Respondent:
T. Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Graham v. Edmark
as 24-1456
Petitioner:
MELVIN C. GRAHAM
Respondent:
MICHELLE EDMARK, Warden, New Hampshire State Prison for Men
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
