Cases 51 - 60 of 265,534
Arrington et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 3:2024cv03029
Plaintiff:
Everett Arrington, Jr. John Collins, Loretta Maynor and others
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Camacho-Silva v. Hobson et al
as 1:2024cv02210
Plaintiff:
Saul Camacho-Silva
Defendant:
William Hobson and Nussbaum Transportation Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Williams v. Louisville Metro Detention Center et al
as 3:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Clifton Clinton Williams, IV
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Detention Center, Chief Jailer, Public Affairs and Human Resources Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DONLEY v. GLOUCESTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2024cv06286
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JAMES DONLEY
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, MAJOR CRIMES CAMDEN COUNTY and CAMDEN COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Florez-Ramirez
as 2:2024cv02335
Plaintiff:
Florez-Ramirez
Defendant:
Jacques Jones, Tracy Williams, Carlus Cleaves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McHugh et al v. Cougle et al
as 2:2024cv01300
Plaintiff:
William McHugh, Anthony Parr and Rebecca Taylor
Defendant:
David Cougle and St. Tammany Parish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hedrick v. Morrsey et al
as 5:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Tanner Ray Hedrick
Defendant:
Patrick Morrsey, William K. Marshell, III, Shelby O. Searls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v Wyoming Governor et al
as 1:2024cv00104
Defendant:
Wyoming Governor, Gillette Mayor, Former Gillette City Attorney and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce B Williams and The Hypatian Society
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pressly v. US
as 24-1823
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. PRESSLY, 8599 CAR LOT, LLC, DIANE M. AKERS and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
