Cases 51 - 60 of 2,349
Ash v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04261
Plaintiff:
Travanon Ash
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ashe et al v. Hargett et al
as 3:2023cv01256
Plaintiff:
Victor Ashe, Phil Lawson and League of Women Voters of Tennessee
Defendant:
Tre Hargett, Mark Goins and Jonathan Skrmetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Randle v. Contra Costa County Conflicts Panel et al
as 3:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Ramello D. Randle
Defendant:
Contra Costa County Conflicts Panel, Anthony Guy Ashe, Lawrence Steven Strauss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ASH v. USA
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
DAVENELL L. ASH
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Ash v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2023cv02473
Plaintiff:
Arthur Ash
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of and Seth Walters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ash Meadows Townhome Association v. AmGuard Insurance Company
as 23-1384
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ASH MEADOWS TOWNHOME ASSOCIATION, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
AMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY
USA v. Rodney Ashe
as 24-1027
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RODNEY ASHE
United States of America v. Simmons
as 23-8062
Defendant:
WINSOME WHITE, DONNIE BETHEA, JR., Wynsome White and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ASHLEY SIMMONS, Robert Simmons and Ash
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Del Cid-De Bonilla, et al. v. Garland
as 21-553
Petitioner:
ANA GREGORIA DEL CID-DE BONILLA and ASHELY ESPERANZA BONILLA-DEL CID
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ash v. Russell
as 1:2023cv02873
Plaintiff:
Julian R. Ash
Defendant:
Judge George L. Russell, III and George L. Russell, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
