Cases 51 - 60 of 6,100
Harel Talasazan v. Robert M. Farrell et al
as 2:2024cv01356
Defendant:
Attorney Poonam Patidar, Robert M. Farrell, Maria R. Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Harel Talasazan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TANNER v. FRENCH et al
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO TARODD TANNER
Defendant:
FRENCH, DIRECTOR CURRY, SKKRUBS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Concentra Health Services, Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv10404
Plaintiff:
Elliot Curry
Defendant:
Concentra Health Services, Inc. a Nevada Corporation, Perry Johnson & Associates, Inc. and Concentra Health Services, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Curry v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv08002
Petitioner:
Ameche Lashuan Curry
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Curry v. Akers
as 6:2024cv00021
Petitioner:
Robert Curry
Respondent:
Daniel Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States v. Hughes
as 24-6021
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CURRIE JERMAINE HUGHES
Currie et al v. My Fav Electronics, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Paula B. Currie and Megan Finnegan-Ratliff
Defendant:
My Fav Electronics, Inc. doing business as Second Life Mac
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Woods v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Woods and Demetrius L Woods
Defendant:
Doe, Gary Musslelwhite, Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ewideh et al v. Homesite Insurance Company of the Midwest et al
as 1:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Omar Ewideh and Nivertiti Geaith
Defendant:
Homesite Insurance Company of The Midwest, American Family Insurance, AFICS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
