Cases 51 - 60 of 347
Knight et al v. United States et al
as 8:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Phyllis M. Knight, Alphonso V. Frazier, II and Phyllis M. Knight Bey D.M.
Defendant:
United States and Robert F. Rossiter, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
C.A. v. The City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
C.A., A.A., A.B. and others
Defendant:
The City of Jackson, Mississippi, Chokwe A. Lumumba, Jr., Tony Yarber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Knight v. City of Omaha et al
as 8:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Phyllis M. Knight and Phyllis M. Knight D.M.
Defendant:
City of Omaha, Judge Sheryl L. Lohaus, Darryl R. Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
P Rose LLC v. D.M. Merchandising, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01234
Plaintiff:
P Rose LLC
Defendant:
D.M. Merchandising, Inc. and Brad M. Goldstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Brown v. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Leroy L. Brown
Defendant:
D.E. Smith, H.C. Taylor, C.C. Barnhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Penn-Star Insurance Company v. Zenith Insurance Company, et al
as 21-16930
Appellant:
PENN-STAR INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant / Appellee:
D.M. AND IZETTA A. CAMP, LP, GOLDEN LABOR SERVICES, LLC and VALENTIN ROMER COLOTL
Counter Claimant:
ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY and DM CAMP & SONS, a general partnership
Knight v. Phillips et al
as 8:2021cv00408
Plaintiff:
Phyllis M. Knight and Phyllis M. Knight Bey D.M.
Defendant:
Lachelle A. Phillips and Arthur Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wake County Board of Education v. D.M. et al
as 5:2021cv00409
Plaintiff:
Wake County Board of Education
Defendant:
J.M., D.M. and G.M.
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
