Cases 51 - 60 of 76
Tracey White, et al v. Thomas Jackson, et al
as 16-3897
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tracey White, Dwayne Anton Matthews, Jr., Damon Coleman and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Thomas Jackson, John Belmar, Justin Cosmo and others
US v. Daniel Hill
as 16-4056
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL HILL
Hill v. City of Chicago Department of Police, The
as 1:2015cv08862
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hill
Defendant:
City of Chicago Department of Police, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv30384
Plaintiff:
Kathy Hill and Daniel Hill
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HILL v. ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv07643
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HILL
Defendant:
ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC., ZIMMER, INC. and DOES 1 THROUGH 50, INCLUSIVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. Iko et al
as 5:2014cv00239
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hill
Defendant:
O Iko, Debra L York and Wendy Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Watson et al
as 5:2013cv00206
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hill
Defendant:
Randy Watson, Moses Jackson, York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. USA-2255
as 1:2013cv00920
Petitioner:
Daniel Hill
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA v. Real Property Located at 4527-
as 11-1579
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4527-4535 MICHIGAN AVENUE, DETROIT, MICHIGAN
Appellant:
CARL BERNAS, DANIEL HILL, CHARLES R. BOKUN and others
USA v. Real Property Located at 4527-, et al
as 11-1500
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4527-4535 MICHIGAN AVENUE, DETROIT, MICHIGAN
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL HILL, CARL BERNAS, CHARLES R. BOKUN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
