Cases 51 - 60 of 85
WEBB v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 2:2014cv00013
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Petitioner:
JAMES WEBB
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nathaniel Webb v. USA
as 14-15095
Petitioner - Appellant:
NATHANIEL JAMES WEBB, AKA Nathaniel Webb
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Webb v. USA
as 2:2013cv02376
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Nathaniel James Webb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Travis Webb v. Director, Virginia Department
as 13-7675
Petitioner - Appellant:
TRAVIS JAMES WEBB
Respondent - Appellee:
DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Abell et al v. Sky Bridge Resources, LLC
as 3:2013cv00869
Plaintiff:
Stephen Abell , Michael Hartman , Robert Pugh and others
Defendant:
Sky Bridge Resources, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Farmer et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2013cv03942
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FARMER , Jean Farmer , Richard Allbee and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Farmer et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2013cv02650
Plaintiff:
Michael Farmer , Jean Farmer , Richard Allbee and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Farmer et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as CAN/3:13-cv-02650
Plaintiff:
Michael Farmer , Jean Farmer , Richard Allbee and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and McKesson Corporation
Haines v. Webb et al
as 1:2013cv01783
Plaintiff:
Caitlyn Haines
Defendant:
James Webb and Sharp Transit, LLC
Students for Life at Eastern Michigan University v. Parker et al
as 2:2013cv11221
Plaintiff:
Students for Life at Eastern Michigan University
Defendant:
Francine Parker, Mike Morris, Floyd Clack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
