Cases 51 - 60 of 306
BELSKIS v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2021cv10322
Defendant:
KEVIN CASSANO, CARL SCEUSA, MD, NICOLETTA TURNER-FOSTER, MD and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH EDWARD BOVIN BELSKIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Borgese v. Columbia Sportswear Company
as 3:2021cv00197
Plaintiff:
Joseph Edward Borgese
Defendant:
Columbia Sportswear Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Luiz v. Trump
as 1:2021cv03836
Defendant:
Donald Trump
Plaintiff:
Joseph Edward Francis Luiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
Hilderbrand v. Lynch et al
as 6:2021cv00163
Defendant:
Wynne Unit Mailroom, Paul Andrew Lynch, Miranda Dawn Crump and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Edward Hilderbrand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barker v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv00974
Defendant:
UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, 3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Edward Barker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abrams v. City of Niagara Falls
as 21-248
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Latisha D. Hamilton, Ernestine Gayle, as Parent and Natural Guardian of A.G., Kevaris Gregory and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Conestoga-Rovers & Associates, City of Niagara Falls, Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc. and others
Kubinski v. Edwards, et al
as 3:2021cv00034
Defendant:
Rodney Prince, Armor Correctional Health Services Inc., Secretary, Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Leo Kubinski and Lorraine Kubinski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hook v. McCray et al
as 3:2021cv00009
Defendant:
Corizon, Inc. Now, R.M.C. Colonel, Dr. Sharma and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher W. Hook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barton v. Warden, Correctional Reception Center
as 2:2021cv00111
Petitioner:
Joseph Edward Barton
Respondent:
Warden, Correctional Reception Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00493
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 633
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
