Cases 51 - 60 of 69
Ratliff v. Sperry Rail, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00259
Plaintiff:
Larry Ratliff and Larry David Ratliff
Defendant:
Sperry Rail, Inc. , Jerry Chapman, Jr. and Does 1 through 10
Counter_claimant:
Jerry Chapman, Jr. and Sperry Rail, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Larry Ratliff
Cross_defendant:
Larry David Ratliff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HISER v. ASTRUE
as 2:2011cv00836
Plaintiff:
LARRY DAVID HISER
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
USA v. Larry Johnson
as 11-12290
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LARRY DAVID JOHNSON, a.k.a. Pie
USA v. Larry Johnson
as 11-12290
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LARRY DAVID JOHNSON, a.k.a. Pie
Reaves v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2011cv00018
Plaintiff:
Larry David Reaves
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Anthony Hawks v. Larry David
as 10-7724
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY D. HAWKS
Plaintiff:
JANENERE HAWKS and DANA ANTHONY HAWKS
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY DAVID, ALLEN ADKINS, DAVID PHIPPS and others
Jackson v. Brickey et al
as 1:2010cv00060
Defendant:
Randall E. Brickey, Barry S. Surber and Town of Saltville
Plaintiff:
Larry David Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hawks et al v. David et al
as 1:2010cv02250
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Hawks, Janenere Hawks and Dana Anthony Hawks
Defendant:
Larry David, Allen Adkins, David Phipps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shuster v. Shuster et al
as 1:2009cv00306
Plaintiff:
Tabatha Blankenship Shuster
Defendant:
Larry David Shuster, Galen Medical Group, P.C. and Galen Medical Group Employees Retirement Savings Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Davenport v. Johnson
as 6:2009cv00766
Plaintiff:
Larry David Davenport
Defendant:
Melissa Johnson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.