Cases 51 - 60 of 683
McCurdy v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05251
Plaintiff:
Theresa McCurdy
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Womens Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
(PC) McCurdy v. Price
as 2:2021cv02156
Plaintiff:
James C. McCurdy
Defendant:
Price, Martinez, D. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) McCurdy v. Price, et al.
as 1:2021cv01699
Plaintiff:
James C. McCurdy
Defendant:
Price, Martinez, D. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez v Bludworth et al.
as 4:2021cv00114
Plaintiff:
Mario Gomez
Defendant:
Peter Bludworth, CO Infanger and Nurse McCurdy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray et al v. Mississppi Department of Rehabilitation Services
as 3:2021cv00710
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Gray and Clell O. McCurdy
Defendant:
Mississppi Department of Rehabilitation Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Porter v. McCurdy et al
as 6:2021cv00311
Plaintiff:
Lamone Morlee Johnson, Marylin Monroe Porter and Marylin Monae Porter
Defendant:
Joel McCurdy and Utilizaton Review Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Currency $3,450 (21-DEA-677202) et al v. McCurdy
as 2:2021mc51244
In Re:
Currency $3,450 (21-DEA-677202), Currency $135,230 (21-DEA-677203), Walther PPS 9mm Handgun S/N AT5149, one 9mm magazine,and 6 rounds of 9mm ammunition (21-DEA-677278) and others
Claimant:
Cantrelle McCurdy
Maureen Corneal v. Debra McCurdy
as 21-2063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAUREEN K. CORNEAL and MAUREEN KATERI CORNEAL
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA MCCURDY, Ph. D., KURT SCHMOKE, MICHELLE WILLIAMS and others
(PC) McCurdy v. Blanco et al
as 2:2021cv01764
Plaintiff:
James C. McCurdy
Defendant:
P. Blanco, Earles and Hougland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
