Cases 51 - 60 of 1,003
Jill Newtal v. DST Systems, Inc.
as 23-2024
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jill McManus Newtal
Defendant / Appellant:
DST Systems, Inc.
Sidney Michael Lee et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01749
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Sidney Michael Lee, Marshall Earl Harris, Demetrius Lenard Houston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
US v. Patrick McManus
as 23-4278
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
PATRICK HILKAH MCMANUS
3137, LLC, et al v. Town of Harwich, et al
as 23-1354
Plaintiff / Appellant:
3137, LLC, 541 MAIN STREET REALTY TRUST, EMBER PIZZA, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
HARWICH, MA, JOSEPH F. POWERS, DAVID J. GUILLEMETTE and others
Chavez v. Ung et al
as 5:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Chavez, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer FNU Ung, Chief of Police William McManus and Foreman Grand Jury Hilda Quezada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jill Newtal v. DST Systems, Inc.
as 23-1767
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jill McManus Newtal
Defendant / Appellant:
DST Systems, Inc.
Drummer v. Paxton et al
as 5:2023cv00389
Plaintiff:
Cornel Jackie Drummer
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Alvin C. Brown, Reginal Speller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCMANUS v. GEICO CHOICE INSURANCE CO.
as 2:2023cv00448
Plaintiff:
MELANIE MCMANUS
Defendant:
GEICO CHOICE INSURANCE CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
McManus v. Agape Baptist Church, Inc.
as 6:2023cv03080
Plaintiff:
Cameron McManus
Defendant:
Agape Baptist Church, Inc. doing business as Agape Boarding School
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
