Cases 51 - 60 of 105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv01947
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. ADAMS et al
as 1:2012cv00177
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN LATIK MOORE
Defendant:
DENNIS CLAYTON ADAMS, II, GILL, D.J. ROOK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
as 4:2012cv02086
Plaintiff:
Benjamin R. Duncan
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duncan v. Bank of America, NA, FNA
as 6:2012cv01154
Defendant:
Bank of America, NA, FNA
Plaintiff:
Mary R. Duncan
Amicu:
Mortgage Electronic Systems, Inc and US Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Weaver v. Duncan et al
as 3:2012cv00276
Plaintiff:
Betty L. Weaver
Defendant:
Milton R. Duncan and USF Holland, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ANDERSON et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv03124
Plaintiff:
JAMAL ANDERSON , KARSTEN BAILEY , CHRISTIE BAILEY and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson v. National Football League et al
as 1:2012cv01541
Plaintiff:
Jamal Anderson , Karsten Bailey , Christie Bailey and others
Defendant:
National Football League and NFL Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson v. National Football League et al
as GAN/1:12-cv-01541
Plaintiff:
Jamal Anderson , Karsten Bailey , Christie Bailey and others
Defendant:
National Football League and NFL Properties, LLC
United States of America v. Duncan
as 1:2012mc91110
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
William R. Duncan
Duncan et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00111
Plaintiff:
Morgan R. Duncan and Matthew J. Baer
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
