Cases 51 - 60 of 69
Banks v. Pivnichny, et al. (MAG+)
as 2:2015cv00369
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Banks v. Pivnichny et al
as 1:2015cv00281
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Banks v. Pivnichny et al
as 2:2015cv00864
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 1:2015cv03368
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, BARACK OBAMA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Pivnichny et al
as 5:2015cv00530
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, Barack Obama, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Obama et al
as 1:2015cv00931
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Barack Obama , Richard Burr , Dianne Feinstein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Banks v. Does, et al
as 2:2013cv00064
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles Samuels, Mike Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. One or More Unknown Named FCC Forrest City Low Compound Officers, et al
as 1:2013cv01357
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
One or More Unknown named FCC Forrest City Low Compound Officers, 50 John/Jane Does, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
McMasters-Stone et al v. Biden
as 2:2012cv02711
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. McMasters-Stone
Defendant:
Joseph Biden, Daniel Akaka, John Barrasso and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wade v. Akaka et al
as 2:2012cv00179
Plaintiff:
E.K. Wade
Defendant:
Daniel Akaka, Lamar Alexander, Kelly Ayotte and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
