Cases 51 - 60 of 1,251
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Garrett v. Anderson et al
as 6:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Marvin Garrett
Defendant:
Jennifer M. Anderson, Errol R. Arthur, Julie Becker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rainey v. Rice et al
as 0:2023cv03202
Plaintiff:
Christopher Allan Rainey
Defendant:
Chief of Police Steven Rice and Officer Joshua Cautheen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rainey v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2023cv01209
Plaintiff:
Annycia Rainey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rainey v. Shuler et al
as 4:2023cv00613
Plaintiff:
Frederick Rainey
Defendant:
Kathern Shuler, Mike Knadal, John Graef and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander Cameron v. T. Ellis, III
as 23-6645
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXANDER CAMERON
Defendant / Appellee:
T. S. ELLIS, III, District Court Judge, JAMES C. CLARK, Circuit Court Judge, BRYAN PORTER, Commonwealth Attorney and others
Love v. Schachtrup et al
as 1:2023cv01243
Plaintiff:
George E Love
Defendant:
Christopher Schachtrup, Christopher Hofmann, Brian Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03996
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
RAINEY v. RASH
as 5:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
GERALD T RAINEY
Defendant:
RASH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAINEY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10940
Plaintiff:
JOE CALVIN RAINEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
