Cases 51 - 60 of 9,686
Shaw v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01641
Plaintiff:
Michael Shaw
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
MURRAY v. SHAW et al
as 1:2024cv00640
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE M MURRAY and MICHELLE M. MURRAY
Defendant:
DEBBIE SHAW, JOSCELYN FUNNIE, LISA REIN and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
AZAR EL v. CABARRUS COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00362
Petitioner:
RASHAUD HUSSEIN AZAR EL doing business as JERIMY LOVE
Respondent:
CABARRUS COUNTY, CABARRUS COUNTY JAIL, MIKE DOWNS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
RIVAZ v. MCNEIL et al
as 5:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
JARREL DANIEL RIVAZ
Defendant:
RAYMOND MCNEIL, JOSEPH HUTCHISON and KRISTIAN SHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaw v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Norman Shaw and Norman Shaw, Jr
Defendant:
Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Brown, Jr. v. Tack et al
as 3:2024cv50110
Plaintiff:
Allen Brown, Jr. and Blue
Defendant:
Andrea Tack, Wende, Billings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHAW et al v. FADDEN
as 2:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SHAW and LISA SHAW
Defendant:
MATTHEW FADDEN doing business as CUSTOM CARE CONSTRUCTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Cromartie v. Reams et al
as 5:2024ct03098
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant:
Ashston Reams, Susan Addams, Marcus Houis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
