Cases 51 - 60 of 100
ADAMS v. GUNDY et al
as 5:2026cv05799
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE ADAMS
Defendant:
CHIMENE VAN GUNDY, OUTSTANDING REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS, INC., EVERFLOW WEALTH, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv07663
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00443
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hibbert v. Union County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2026cv00428
Plaintiff:
Emily Ann Hibbert
Defendant:
Union County, Tennessee, William F Breeding, II, Jeremy Meltabarger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts #280668 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2026cv06401
Plaintiff:
Brandon Roberts
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Stephanie Moulton, NaphCare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pledger v. Helder et al
as 5:2026cv05227
Plaintiff:
Arwesley Charles Pledger
Defendant:
Tim Helder, Dr. Robert Karas and Stephanie Lewie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re: Dante A. Hyndman
as 26-2497
Respondent:
TONY DACOSTA GREENIDGE, BELINDA NUNEZ, WESTCHESTER COUNTY and others
Petitioner:
DANTE A. HYNDMAN
Barrios v. Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, et al.
as 26-5828
Plaintiff:
GABRIELA STEPHANIE BARRIOS
Defendant:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, ANTELOPE VALLEY CHEVROLET, INC. and Detective MICHAEL GELARDO
Grayson et al v. McGuffy
as 1:2026cv00895
Plaintiff:
Joseph W. Grayson and Christy J. Grayson
Defendant:
Sheriff Charmaine McGuffy, NaphCare, Inc, Jennifer Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
