Cases 51 - 60 of 464
Davison et al v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2022pq01033
Plaintiff:
Thomas William Davison and Diana Lynn Davison
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Syngenta AG and Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jarrell v. Young et al
as 1:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
Tamara Lee Jarrell
Defendant:
James Denson Young and Thomas William Mangham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Pinkston v. Williams et al
as 1:2022cv01050
Plaintiff:
Steven Pinkston
Defendant:
Thomas Williams, Andy Dickson and James Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd, Sr. v. Williams et al
as 1:2022cv00632
Plaintiff:
Nolan Kinard Floyd, Sr.
Defendant:
Officer Thomas Williams and CO Adewale Kassim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Shields v. Williams et al
as 3:2022cv00261
Plaintiff:
Eric Shields
Defendant:
Thomas Williams, David Lupas, Matthew Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard et al v. Reynolds et al
as 1:2022cv00412
Plaintiff:
Cornelius A. Howard, Davoric Tilman, Michael Anthony Thomas and others
Defendant:
Sgt. C. Reynold, Capt. Deese, Major Duane Whisenhunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Wooten v. USA
as 21-3303
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS WILLIAM WOOTEN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv08990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv62821
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WILLIAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Hung, et al
as 1:2021cv01863
Plaintiff:
Thomas Williams
Defendant:
Michelle Hung and Matt Lundy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
