Cases 51 - 60 of 276
Kowalczyk v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv00950
Defendant:
Administrative Remedy Coordinator of Florence FCC/USP, Health Services Dept. of BOP, US Marshal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Kowalczyk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCall v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 1:2021cv00446
Plaintiff:
Darron McCall
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, Federal Dept of Justice, US Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate #145822 v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 1:2021cv00243
Petitioner:
Curtis Tate #145822 and Willie Perry Woods
Respondent:
Michigan Parole Board, US Marshals Service and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Young et al
as 5:2021cv00220
Respondent:
S Young and US Marshals Service
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bennett v. Smith et al
as 6:2021cv00010
Defendant:
US Marshal Service, Unknown Parties and Larry Smith
Plaintiff:
Richard Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GHAHARY et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2021cv00002
Defendant:
Federal Transfer Center, United States Bureau of Prisons, JOHN DOE, 2 and others
Plaintiff:
DARIUS A GHAHARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hillsberg v. US Marshals Service
as 2:2020cv01848
Petitioner:
Earl James Hillsberg
Respondent:
US Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GOMEZ v. US MARSHAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2020cv00571
Defendant:
US MARSHAL SERVICE, T. J. WATSON and WILLIAM BARR
Plaintiff:
PAUL MICHAEL GOMEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. US Marshals Service et al
as 3:2020cv02465
Defendant:
US Marshalls, Attorney General Of the US, Warden - FCI Aliceville and others
Plaintiff:
Nancy B Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Al Cannon Detention Center et al
as 8:2020cv02897
Respondent:
US Marshal Service, Al Cannon Detention Center and Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
Vincent B Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
