Cases 61 - 70 of 100
Arnold, et al v. FCA US, LLC
as 1:2026cv01062
Plaintiff:
Kyle Arnold, Rahul Bhardwaj, Krista Campano and others
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Lisle v. Hughes et al
as 1:2026cv01352
Plaintiff:
Steven D Lisle, Jr.
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, . Perez, . Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv06699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Nicholas Alan Holley v. Dyncorp International LLC et al
as 5:2026cv04584
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS ALAN HOLLEY
Defendant:
Dyncorp International LLC, Amentum Holdings, Inc., Amentum Government Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Kelly v. Kroger
as 26-60641
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Kelly
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I, CAC Operations, L.L.C., doing business as A1 Towing and Hauling and Nolan Booth
Vaughn v. John/Jane Doe
as 3:2026cv00375
Plaintiff:
Crystal Deana Vaughn
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
VAUGHN v. THOMAS COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 7:2026cv00224
Defendant:
MS TIPPINS, THOMAS COUNTY GEORGIA, THOMAS COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
LISA ANN VAUGHN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Arkansas, State of
as 2:2026cv02123
Petitioner:
Vaughn Damon Wilson
Respondent:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Shiddell v. Vaughn et al
as 2:2026cv01332
Plaintiff:
Adrian Shiddell, Jr
Defendant:
Amy Vaughn, Capt Shallow and DJA Lewandowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv03452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
