Cases 61 - 70 of 40,315
Anderson v. Tate et al
as 1:2024cv02357
Plaintiff:
Kyrima Anderson
Defendant:
Sandie Tate, Guaranty Mortgage Services, Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Anderson v. United States of America, et al
as 3:2024cv00516
Defendant:
Carlton Anderson, United States of America and Lisa Marie Groth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Amador v. Anderson
as 2:2024cv00737
Petitioner:
Daniel S Amador, II
Respondent:
Lisa Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carrillo v. Anderson Lock & Safe
as 2:2024cv01243
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
Anderson Lock & Safe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2024cv01268
Plaintiff:
Nina Anderson
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anderson et al v. Kemp et al
as 1:2024cv02359
Plaintiff:
Kyrima Anderson, Patrick A. Long, II and Kyrimas Heirs Trust
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Christopher Carr, John F. King and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00126
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
