Cases 61 - 70 of 72,624
THOMPSON v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, LLP et al
as 1:2024cv00809
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS THOMPSON
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, LLP, MICHAEL MITCHEFF, DUAN PIERCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Great Harvest Franchising v. Green et al
as 2:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Great Harvest Franchising
Defendant:
Gregory Andrew Williams Green and Kimberly Elaine Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
MIRCHANDANI v. JEWELL et al
as 3:2024cv06091
Petitioner:
KEITH MIRCHANDANI
Respondent:
ANDREW JEWELL and KAYLLE JEWELL
Interested Party:
TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC.
Michiana Area Electrical Workers' Pension Fund v. Inari Medical, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03686
Plaintiff:
Michiana Area Electrical Workers' Pension Fund
Defendant:
Inari Medical, Inc., William Hoffman, Andrew Hykes and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Lewis v. Bilda et al
as 2:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Marcus L Lewis
Defendant:
Sgt Andrew Bilda, Francisco J Izquierdo, Steven Haw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bellomo v. Big Lots Inc.
as 2:2024cv03480
Plaintiff:
Andrew Bellomo
Defendant:
Big Lots Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Adam et al v. BNP Paribas, S.A. et al
as 1:2024cv03639
Plaintiff:
Abdelbari Eltigani M Adam, Elshazly Rahma, Ismail Ahmed Alnour and others
Defendant:
BNP Paribas, S.A. and BNP Paribas US Wholesale Holdings, Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Hango v. Eskew
as 24-1269
Plaintiff:
ANDREW SAMUEL HANGO
Defendant:
DAVID ESKEW, DECHERT LLP, CARLYNE TURNER BEVERLY, Descher LLP Law Firm and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. FAT Brands, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03913
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
FAT Brands, Inc., Andrew Wiederhorn, Ron Roe and others
United States v. Louis Rabbitt, Jr.
as 24-1987
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Louis Andrew Rabbitt, Jr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
