Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 5,997
Gary El-BeyIn re: Gary El-Bey
as 24-10341
Petitioner: In re: Gary Dion Allen El-Bey
BEY v. FULLERTON et al
as 2:2024cv00584
Petitioner: ZAMA ELOAH BEY and Candace Rae Winstead
Respondent: WILLIAM FULLERTON, PUBLIC SERVANT SCHULUCK, SARGEANT FORSYTHE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bey v. Carter-Haston et al
as 3:2024cv00395
Plaintiff: Hanif Rahim Bey
Defendant: Carter-Haston, Brownlee Whitlow & Praet, L. Marc Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Love Bey et al v. Montgomery et al
as 2:2024cv10982
Plaintiff: Michell Love Bey, I, Sheikess M. Love Bey, I and Michell Love
Defendant: Angela Montgomery and Marshall Montgomery
ANDERSON v. WASHINGTON COUNTY JAIL, INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00669
Plaintiff: DEJAUNE L. ANDERSON and PRINCESS CALIFIA HATUN TUPAK BEY II
Defendant: WASHINGTON COUNTY JAIL, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. USA
as 1:2024cv00613
Plaintiff: DEWAYNE JONES and ABDUL MUNTAQIM LBU JONES BEY
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Malik Bey v. Superintendent Laurel Highlands SCI, et al
as 24-1667
Plaintiff: MALIK ABDUL BEY
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
BEY v. SOSAVICKA et al
as 2:2024cv00556
Plaintiff: ZAMA ELOAHBEY, ZAMA ELOAH BEY and Candace Rae Winstead
Defendant: DAVID SOSAVICKA, CHESWICK MAGISTERIAL, CANDACE WINSTEAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Rodney Higgins, Jr.
as 24-5331
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: RODNEY HAMILTON HIGGINS, JR., aka Rodney L. Higgins, aka Ermias Bey
Helias Severus El-Bey v. Jason Reeves, et al
as 24-1294
Plaintiff: HELIAS HERMES SEVERUS EL-BEY, aka Paul Goree
Defendant: FIREFIGHTER JASON REEVES, (EMS) and WAYNE FIRE DEPARTMENT (E.M.S)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?