Cases 61 - 70 of 199
Klein, et al. v. Cabela, et al
as 1:2017cv00698
Plaintiff:
Adam Klein , Bernard Garcarz and Christopher A. Brown
Defendant:
James W. Cabela , Theodore M. Armstrong , Michael R. McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Garcarz v. Cabelas, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00699
Plaintiff:
Bernard Garcarz
Defendant:
Cabelas, Inc., Theodore M. Armstrong, James W. Cabela and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Ursch v. Cabela's Incorporated et al
as 4:2017cv01623
Plaintiff:
Jeffery C. Ursch
Defendant:
Cabela's Incorporated and Cabela's Retail MO, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Teel v. Cabela's Wholesale, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00945
Plaintiff:
Stephen Teel
Defendant:
Cabela's Wholesale, Inc. and Cabela's Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
State Farm Fire & Casulty Company v. Cabela's Inc.
as 3:2016cv02228
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire & Casulty Company
Defendant:
Cabela's Inc. , Weston Products and Guangdong Vanward Electric Co., LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goff et al v. Cabela's Wholesale Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv00157
Plaintiff:
John Goff and Janice Goff
Defendant:
Cabela's Wholesale Inc. , Cabela's Marketing and Brand Management, Inc. , Cabela's Ventures, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reese v. Hoyt Archery et al
as 4:2016cv01503
Plaintiff:
Keith Reese
Defendant:
Hoyt Archery , Easton Technical Products, Inc. and Cabela's Retail MO, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Eldridge v. Cabela's Incorporated
as 3:2016cv00536
Plaintiff:
Franklin Eldridge
Defendant:
Cabela's Incorporated
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on use of telephone equipment
Kobace LLC v. Cabela's Incorporated
as 6:2016cv00307
Plaintiff:
Kobace LLC
Defendant:
Cabela's Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
