Cases 61 - 70 of 447
Driver v. Robinson et al
as 3:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
Demario Q Driver
Defendant:
Brandon Robinson, Christopher Johnson, John Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. RULE
as 2:2022cv00454
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gregory v. Heban et al
as 3:2022cv01756
Plaintiff:
Laron A. Gregory
Defendant:
Kenneth Heban, Rutkowski, Brian Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Veronica-Lynn Everett-Boyce v. J. Baum et al
as 2:2022cv06651
Plaintiff:
Veronica Lynn Everett-Boyce
Defendant:
J. Baum, John Doe No. 1, John Doe No. 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. USA
as 2:2022cv00116
Petitioner:
Sternell Christopher Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Richard Aitchison Aitchison et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05049
Plaintiff:
Richard Aitchison Aitchison, Miranda Anderson, Paul Anderson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Johnson v. USA
as 2:2022cv00087
Petitioner:
Sternell Christopher Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Spears v. Payne et al
as 2:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
James Spears, Jr
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William F Straughn, Michael H Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry v. Payne et al
as 2:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
Jarell D Terry
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, Michael Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aitchison et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00840
Plaintiff:
Richard Aitchison Aitchison, Miranda Anderson, Paul Anderson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
