Cases 61 - 70 of 10,800
Ramirez et al v. Vaughn et al
as 2:2024cv02488
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Latanya Marie Vaughn and Liberty Personal Insurance Company
Petitioner:
United Financial Casualty Company
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Ramirez and Nadia Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv01827
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv02961
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Holbrook III v. Hinds et al
as 1:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
Grant Gilbert Lee Holbrook III
Defendant:
April Hausler, Nick Hinds and Stephen A Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARON-STOREY et al v. GILBERT et al
as 1:2024cv01789
Defendant:
CHARLEY, JANE DOE #4, JANE DOE #5 and others
Plaintiff:
BROWN and ANSHIOUS B.D. ARON-STOREY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melquist v. Gilbert et al
as 3:2024cv01709
Defendant:
Tate Transportation, Inc. and David Wayne Gilbert
Plaintiff:
Amy Melquist
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02611
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flanders v. Larsen et al
as 2:2024cv00931
Defendant:
Gilbert Noe and Colette Larsen
Plaintiff:
Willie James Flanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GONZALEZ v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00467
Respondent:
WARDEN
Petitioner:
GILBERT ROMERO GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
REYNOLDS v. CENTURION HEALTH et al
as 2:2024cv00459
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, LIZ DOE, LESA WOLFE and others
Plaintiff:
ANGELO REYNOLDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
