Cases 61 - 70 of 3,607
Gibbs v. USA
as 4:2024cv00152
Petitioner:
Andrew Gibbs
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Gibbs v. Utilization Review Committee
as 24-891
Plaintiff:
DAVID GIBBS
Defendant:
CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, FEDUS, Dr., PILLAI, Dr. and others
Gibbs v. Ottawa County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
John Gibbs
Defendant:
Ottawa County Board of Commissioners and Joe Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01020
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Gibbs
as 2:2024cv10879
Plaintiff:
Jazmund E Jenkins
Defendant:
Delshawn Orlando Martinez Gibbs and Delshawn Orlando-Martez Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tremaine Gibbs v. Los Angeles Police Dept.
as 2:2024cv02893
Plaintiff:
Tremaine Gibbs
Defendant:
Los Angeles Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Consumers' Research v. FCC
as 24-60160
Petitioner:
Consumers' Research, Cause Based Commerce, Incorporated, Edward J. Blum and others
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Hoffman et al v. Pirc et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Hoffman, Joseph F. Laffey, Blake Huffman and others
Defendant:
Ken Pirc, Tracy Dietsch, Anne Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Methodist Hospital et al
as 4:2024cv01214
Plaintiff:
James H Jones
Defendant:
Methodist Hospital, District Attorney's Office, Roy Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melvin Gibbs v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 24-1262
Appellant:
M. EUGENE GIBBS and MELVIN EUGENE GIBBS
Defendant:
NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Plaintiff:
KRISTOFFER HICKS, LAQUITA OLIVER, CHERELLE JACOB and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
