Cases 61 - 70 of 2,866
Smith v. Fritter et al
as 3:2023cv01043
Plaintiff:
Bradley Smith and Bradley J Smith
Defendant:
Sherry Fritter, M Hubbard, Wexford of Indiana, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Charlotte C.I.
as 2:2023cv01118
Plaintiff:
Stepfon J Smith and Stepfon J. Smith
Defendant:
Charlotte C.I and Charlotte C.I.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv02029
Petitioner:
LINDA J. SMITH
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Smith v. Martin et al
as 4:2023cv01087
Plaintiff:
Joseph J Smith
Defendant:
Melanie Martin, Cynthia Smith, Janick Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv01094
Plaintiff:
Joseph J Smith
Defendant:
Eric S Higgins and Melanie Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Dotson et al
as 7:2023cv00743
Petitioner:
Dayomic J. Smith
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson and D. Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker et al v. Beard et al
as 1:2023cv10028
Plaintiff:
Jeff Parker and Tian Yang
Defendant:
Gregory A. Beard, William B. Spence, Ricardo R.A. Larroude and others
Nominal Defendant:
Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Traudt v. Lebanon Police Department, City of Lebanon et al
as 1:2023cv00500
Plaintiff:
Scott Traudt
Defendant:
Lebanon Police Department, City of Lebanon, Phillip Roberts, Richard Smolenski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
