Cases 61 - 70 of 94
Morris v. Warren et al
as 3:2010cv01167
Plaintiff:
Julian S. Morris
Defendant:
James Warren and Jeffry Poach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARREN v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv71254
Plaintiff:
JAMES WARREN
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Warren v. Continental Airlines, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00584
Plaintiff:
James Warren
Defendant:
Continental Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Airline Crash
Cox et al v. KBR, Inc. et al
as 8:2009cv03306
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Morgan Cox and James Warren Garland
Defendant:
KBR, Inc., Kellogg, Brown & Root Services, Inc., Kellogg, Brown & Root LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Warren v. Epps et al
as 2:2010cv00022
Plaintiff:
Alexander James Warren
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Ronald King, Mike Hatten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. Broward County Housing Authority et al
as 0:2009cv61957
Plaintiff:
James Warren
Defendant:
Broward County Housing Authority, Broward County Transit Authority and Broward County Clinic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cox et al v. KBR, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv11913
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Morgan Cox and James Warren Garland
Defendant:
KBR, Inc., Kellogg, Brown & Root Services, Inc., Kellogg, Brown & Root LLC and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
warren v. Continental Airlines, Inc.
as 4:2009cv03425
Defendant:
Continental Airlines, Inc.
Plaintiff:
james warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
USA v. Mark Radley, et al
as 09-20699
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK DAVID RADLEY, JAMES WARREN SUMMERS, CODY DEAN CLABORN and others
Warren v. Lane et al
as 5:2009cv01840
Plaintiff:
James Warren
Defendant:
Samuel Lane and City of Huntsville, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
