Cases 61 - 70 of 117
McDonald v. Sandoval et al
as 3:2016cv00112
Plaintiff:
James McDonald
Defendant:
Sandoval and Medical Administrator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald v. Sandoval et al. DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 4:2016cv00961
Plaintiff:
James McDonald
Defendant:
Sandoval and Medical Administrator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larson v. McDonald et al
as 4:2016cv00871
Plaintiff:
Scott Larson
Defendant:
James McDonald, Scott Kernan and California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wills v. McDonald
as 2:2015cv01515
Petitioner:
Rodney A. Wills
Respondent:
Kamala D. Harris and James McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY v. MCDONALD et al
as 2:2015cv03551
Plaintiff:
UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant:
DIANA MCDONALD and JAMES MCDONALD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Malnes v. Flagstaff, City of et al
as 3:2015cv08113
Plaintiff:
Brian Edward Malnes
Defendant:
Flagstaff, City of , Michelle D'Andrea , Robert Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv26988
Plaintiff:
Linda McDonald and James McDonald
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams et al v. Walgreen Co
as 4:2014cv02761
Plaintiff:
Henry Adams , Worvell Ray Aldridge , Harry Aubrey, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Walgreen Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hernandez v. Stone et al
as 2:2014cv01590
Defendant:
Lonnie G Stone, Antonio Sanchez, Jr., Unknown Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Armando Hernandez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paletta et al v. Rhode Island Board of Examiners in Dentistry et al
as 1:2014cv00309
Defendant:
Rhode Island Board of Examiners in Dentistry , Rhode Island Board of Pharmacy , Catherine Cordy and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Paletta , Mohammad Banki and Facial & Oral Surgery, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
