Cases 61 - 70 of 188
Skinner v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2018cv02042
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey William Skinner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Jeffrey Williams v. Brad Livingston, Executive Dir, et al
as 18-20408
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE and JANICE ULMER, Administrative Assistant IV of the Sex Offenders Rehabilitation Program
Williams v. Murrie
as 1:2018cv00292
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Williams
Defendant:
Daniel Murrie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. REARDON et al
as 2:2018cv09326
Plaintiff:
TAHEESHA A. SMITH
Defendant:
JEFFREY WILLIAM REARDON and 901 LOGISTICS, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. State of Tennessee (TV3)
as 3:2018cv00075
Plaintiff:
John-Jeffrey Williams
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Kilburn v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv10490
Plaintiff:
Robert Kilburn
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. , Jeffrey Williams and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Winters v. Zeno Digital Solutions, LLC d/b/a Zeno Imaging
as 3:2018cv00218
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey William Winters
Defendant:
Zeno Digital Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pannell v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage et al
as 4:2018cv00141
Plaintiff:
Dan Michael Pannell
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., BOK Financial and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Pannell v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage et al
as 4:2018mc00153
Plaintiff:
Dan Michael Pannell
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., BOK Financial and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Smith v. Clarke
as 2:2017cv00617
Petitioner:
Jeffrey William Smith
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
