Cases 61 - 70 of 223
Garrett v. Pennymac Loan Services et al
as 3:2018cv00718
Plaintiff:
June Garrett
Defendant:
Pennymac Loan Services , Stanford L. Kurland , James K. Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Espy et al v. AbbVie, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02355
Plaintiff:
Robert Espy and Linda B. Espy
Defendant:
AbbVie, Inc. and Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walters v. Sanofi US Services Inc., et al
as 2:2018cv01252
Plaintiff:
Linda B. Walters
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calahan v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv03095
Plaintiff:
Linda B. Calahan
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dobson v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv06844
Plaintiff:
Linda B Dobson
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nichols v. Sabzwari
as 4:2017cv01621
Plaintiff:
Linda B Nichols
Defendant:
Aleena Sabzwari , Little River Dental Center and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
B., et al v. Connecticut General Life Ins., et al
as 17-4073
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN B., LINDA B. and MATTHEW B.
Defendant - Appellee:
CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, CIGNA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH and INTEL CORPORATION MEDICAL BENEFIT PLAN
Kuhn et al v. Zehringer et al
as 2:2017cv00315
Plaintiff:
Darrell Kuhn , Kevin Kuhn , Baucher Farms, Inc. and others
Defendant:
James Zehringer , John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
