Cases 61 - 70 of 571
RODESNO-LOPES v. KNIGHT
as 1:2023cv00615
Petitioner:
JERMAN RODESNO-LOPES
Respondent:
STEVIE M. KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cornelius Lopes v. Kevin DeLeon, et al
as 21-16476
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CORNELIUS LOPES
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN DELEON, NANCY PELOSI, GAVIN NEWSOM and others
Galego v. City of Fall River et al
as 1:2022cv12243
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Galego
Defendant:
City of Fall River, Albert F Dupere, Athanasios Parousis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv09224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Foley v. Koumal et al
as 4:2022cv00573
Plaintiff:
Matthew V Foley, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert Koumal, Scott Lowing, Linda Everett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FIRSTLINE NATIONAL v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 2:2022cv06488
Plaintiff:
INSURANCE COMPANY FIRSTLINE NATIONAL and FIRSTLINE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
MARIO NAPOLITANO, TONI LYNN NAPOLITANO, CONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONALS EUROPEAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Lopes v. Visible Supply Chain Management, LLC
as 1:2022cv04442
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Lopes
Defendant:
Visible Supply Chain Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
US v. Vavic
as 22-1835
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
JOVAN VAVIC
Interested Party:
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES, REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA and others
Maria Lopes v. David Borts
as 22-7159
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Maria Da Luz Lopes
Defendant / Appellee:
David A. Borts
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv08271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
