Cases 61 - 70 of 77
Daniel Staley v. Judge Russo
as 09-6926
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL LEVERN STALEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGE RUSSO, ED CLEMENS, Solicitor, TIMOTHY H. POGUE, Judge and others
Reaves v. Rhodes et al
as 4:2009cv00820
Plaintiff:
Franklin C Reaves
Defendant:
Sherry R Rhodes, Jerry Vinson, Marion County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RICHARDSON v. USA
as 1:2009cv00156
Petitioner:
JOHN MARK RICHARDSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Lott v. Juergens et al
as 1:2009cv00021
Plaintiff:
Marvin Liddell Lott
Defendant:
Stephen Juergens, Terry Lynn Brown, Mark Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Franklin Reaves v. South Carolina Department of S
as 09-1198
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKLIN C. REAVES, Ph. D., and others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Willie D. Reaves, HYBERT N. STRICKLAND, individually and in his official capacity, SHERRY RHODES, individually and in her official capacity as Clerk of Court of Marion County and others
David Washington v. Daryl Burns
as 08-1924
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID J. WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
DARYL L. BURNS, Marion County Magistrate, DIANE SCOTT, JUDGE BRISTOW and others
Charles Steele v. Mark Richardson, et al
as 08-2147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES STEELE
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK RICHARDSON, ESQ., TONI MEADOWS and MARK W RICHARDSON PC
Richardson et al v. Bridges et al
as 5:2008cv00055
Plaintiff:
Virgil Richardson and Mark Richardson
Defendant:
Robert Bridges, Terry Reed and Red River County, Texas
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rev. Franklin C. Reaves v. South Carolina Department of Social Services et al
as 4:2008cv00576
Plaintiff:
Franklin C Reaves
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Social Services-Willie D Reaves, Hybert N Strickland, Sherry R Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
