Cases 61 - 70 of 2,594
McDowell v. United Fire & Casualty Company
as 4:2023cv03238
Plaintiff:
John Harvey McDowell
Defendant:
United Fire & Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. McDowell
as 23-3992
Petitioner / Appellant:
HUMBERTO GONZALEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
NEIL MCDOWELL
MCDOWELL v. GOULDS PUMPS INC. et al
as 2:2023cv02062
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY L. MCDOWELL
Defendant:
GOULDS PUMPS INC., CATERPILLAR, INC. and CATERPILLAR GLOBAL MINING LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Muhummad v. McDowell et al
as 4:2023cv01130
Plaintiff:
Willie Murry JuQan Demetrices Muhummad
Defendant:
Shalla McDowell, Karma Thorn, Ridgle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore v. Shipman et al
as 4:2023cv01138
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
James Shipman, Mariece Culclager, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcus Aubry v. Neil McDowell
as 5:2023cv02400
Petitioner:
Marcus Aubry
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vickers v. Mcdowell et al
as 1:2023cv01646
Plaintiff:
Andrea Lavelle Vickers
Defendant:
C O Mcdowell, Unknown Correctional Officer, C Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McDowell v. Dallas County, Texas
as 3:2023cv02543
Plaintiff:
Christopher McDowell
Defendant:
Dallas County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
