Cases 61 - 70 of 550
Smith v. Comfort et al
as 1:2022cv02891
Plaintiff:
Billy Ralph Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael Comfort, Kevin Billips, Sheriff Neil Warran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Joseph McAdams
as 22-2213
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSEPH MCADAMS
Scott v. Waterstraat et al
as 3:2022cv03116
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott
Defendant:
Waterstraat, . Bowen, John Doe, 11 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. McAdam
as 22-1268
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Robert McAdam
MCADAMS v. PHILADELPHIA NAVAL YARD et al
as 2:2022cv02087
Plaintiff:
MS ARLENE MCADAMS
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA NAVAL YARD, PHILADELPHIA NAVY YARD ASSOCIATES, SMITH,DEMARCO & COMPANY INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McAdams v. Kidd et al
as 6:2022cv06050
Plaintiff:
Joe B. McAdams
Defendant:
Brandon Franklin Kidd and Kidd Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Fitch v. McAdams et al
as 2:2022cv00523
Plaintiff:
Terrence Fitch
Defendant:
Thomas McAdams, James Sullivan, Lisa Bangert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain v. Healey et al
as 1:2022cv10545
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Attorney General Maura Healey, Bill Galvin, Ed Markey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Elam v. Overstreet et al
as 1:2022cv01398
Plaintiff:
Eric Jordan Elam and Ahuto Dakidd
Defendant:
Damion Overstreet, Jeffrey McAdams and Cherokee County District Attorney Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
